Abstract
This article uses a quantitative approach to study the reception of women writers in post-war Britain. Using data from two influential journals in the period (1946–1960), the TLS and the Listener, we first establish a list of those contemporary British women writers who were most frequently mentioned in these magazines. We then compare their representation in the magazines to that of three comparison groups: a selection of British male contemporary writers, well-known earlier British women writers, and canonical male authors. We explore how the differential categories of gender and canonicity intersect in the (under ) representation of contemporary women writers, and how this underrepresentation not only holds true for the mid-twentieth century but, at least as it is reflected in the attention paid to writers by TLS reviewers, continues in the later 20th and early 21st century.
How to Cite:
Berensmeyer, I. & Trurnit, S., (2022) “Post-War British Women Writers and their Cultural Impact: A Quantitative Approach”, Journal of Cultural Analytics 7(1), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.33994 (external link, opens in new tab).